Union Budget 2021-2022: Analysis of the proposed provision in the Finance Bill (Goods and Services Tax)

Key Aspects of the Union Budget 2021-2022
 The Union Budget for the Financial Year 2021-2022 was presented by Hon’ble Finance Minister Smt Nirmala Sitharaman ji on 01st February The budget principally focuses on quick recovery and growth of economy, especially after the greatest dip ever seen due
to the Covid-19 pandemic.
 The key areas which are noted to be the pillars of the Budget as envisaged in the Budget speech of the Hon’ble Finance Minister are as follows.

  • Health and Wellbeing.
  • Physical and Financial Capital and Infrastructure.
  • Inclusive Development.
  • Reinvigorating Human Capital.
  • Innovation and R&D.
  • Mimimum Government and Maximum Governance
Sr NoProvision Prior to
Amendments
Provision after the proposed
amednment
Analysis and Impacts
1As per entry 7, Schedule II
to the CGST Act 2017,
Supply of Goods The
following shall be treated as
supply of goods, namely
Supply of goods by any
unincorporated association
or body of persons to a
member thereof for cash,
deferred payment or other
valuable consideration.
Bill seeks to amend section 7 of the
Central Goods and Services Tax Act,
2017, with retrospective effect
from the 1st July, 2017, by
inserting a new clause (aa) in subsection
(1) thereof, so as to ensure
levy of tax on activities or
transactions involving supply of
goods or services by any person,
other than an individual, to its
members or constituents or viceversa,
for cash, deferred payment
or other valuable consideration. It
is also proposed to insert an
Explanation therein, to clarify that
the person or its members or
constituents shall be deemed to be
two separate persons and the
supply of activities or transactions
inter se shall be deemed to take
place from one person to another.
There has always been a buzz
about the supplies made by
the associations/clubs to its
members and taxability
thereof. The insertion of this
provision clarifies the tax
charging intent of the law in
this regard. Also, in addition
to this, we believe that the
specific insertion in Schedule
II earlier, limited the scope to
taxability only in case of goods
now even the services will be
brought under its ambit. Entry
in Sch II now stands omitted
retrospectively. It would be
however interesting to see as
to how classification as goods
or services will be taken care
of especially in case of
bundled supplies.
2P r o visions of Section 16(2)
Notwithstanding anything
contained in this section,
no registered person shall
be entitled to the credit of
any input tax in respect of
any supply of goods or
services or both to him
unless,
(a) he is in possession of a
tax invoice or debit note
issued by a supplier
registered under this Act,
or such other tax paying
documents as may be
prescribed
Clause 100 of the Bill seeks to
amend section 16 of the
Central Goods and Services
Tax Act by inserting a new
clause
(aa) in sub-section (2) thereof,
so as to provide that input tax
credit on invoice or debit note
may be availed only when the
details of such invoice or
debit note has been furnished
by the supplier in the
statement of outward
supplies and such details have
been communicated to the
recipient of such invoice or
debit note.
By virtue of making changes under
Rule 36(4), which limited ITC
availment from 120% to 105% of
amount of tax credit appearing in
GSTR 2A/2B, Industry was always in
a fix as to adherence to the same.
The point of argument was, can
rules override the act?. A big full
stop on all such arguments will
come in effect. Its now an open and
shut case. If the inward supplies
(taxable under forward charge and
procured from registered supplier),
do not appear in GSTR-2A/2B, then
even when all other conditions are
satisfied ITC for the tax period
cannot be availed. (RCM inward
supplies will continue on self claim
basis along with other provisions of
Section 16).
3( 5 ) Every registered person
whose turnover during a
financial year exceeds the
prescribed limit shall get
his accounts audited by a
chartered accountant or a
cost accountant and shall
submit a copy of the
audited annual accounts,
the reconciliation
statement under subsection
(2) of section 44
and such other documents
in such form and manner
as may be prescribed
Clause 101 of the Bill seeks to
omit sub-section (5) of section
35 of the Central Goods and
Services Tax Act
So as to remove the
mandatory requirement of
getting annual accounts
audited and the reconciliation
statement submitted by
specified professional.
GST annual returns and
reconciliation statement now will
have to be self certified by the
registered person.
This move will definitely hurt the
professional body as the attest
function is being taken away.
However, the professionals can
continue to guide in arriving at the
reconciliation and self certification.
On a lighter note
‘Protest’s mehenge pad gaye’
4(1) Every registered person, other
than an Input Service Distributor, a
person paying tax under section 51 or
section 52, a casual taxable person
and a non-resident taxable person,
shall furnish an annual return for
every financial year electronically in
such form and manner as may be
prescribed on or before the thirty-first
day of December following the end of
such financial year. (2) Every
registered person who is required to
get his accounts audited in accordance
with the provisions of sub-section (5)
of section 35 shall furnish,
electronically, the annual return under
sub-section (1) along with a copy of
the audited annual accounts and a
reconciliation statement, reconciling
the value of supplies declared in the
return furnished for the financial year
with the audited annual financial
statement, and such other particulars
as may be prescribed
“44. Every registered person, other
than an Input Service Distributor, a
person paying tax under section 51
or section 52, a casual taxable
person and a non-resident taxable
person shall furnish an annual
return which may include a self
certified reconciliation statement,
reconciling the value of supplies
declared in the return furnished
for the financial year, with the
audited annual financial statement
for every financial year
electronically, within such time
and in such form and in such
manner as may be prescribed:
Provided that the Commissioner
may, on the recommendations of
the Council, by notification, exempt
any class of registered persons from
filing annual return under this
section.
The furnishing of
information in annual
returns and
reconciliation will be
made on self
certification basis.
However we believe
that the applicability
of this provision will
be from a future date
yet to be notified.
Professionals viz
CA/CMA undertaking
such audits will need
to take the heat of
this. However, as
mentioned earlier
they can guide the
clients to get the
reconciliations
prepared and vouch
for the numbers therein.
550 . (1) Every person
who is liable to pay tax
in accordance with the
provisions of this Act or
the rules made
thereunder, but fails to
pay the tax or any part
thereof to the
Government within the
period prescribed, shall
for the period for which
the tax or any part
thereof remains unpaid,
pay, on his own, interest
at such rate, not
exceeding eighteen per
cent., as may be notified
by the Government on
the recommendations of
the Council
In section 50 of the Central Goods and
Services Tax Act, in sub-section (1), for
the proviso, the following proviso shall
be substituted and shall be deemed to
have been substituted with effect
from the 1st day of July, 2017, namely.
“Provided that the interest on tax
payable in respect of supplies made
during a tax period and declared in the
return for the said period furnished
after the due date in 78 accordance
with the provisions of section 39,
except where such return is furnished
after commencement of any
proceedings under section 73 or
section 74 in respect of the said
period, shall be payable on that
portion of the tax which is paid by
debiting the electronic cash ledger.”.
During the year 2020, by virtue
of the press release and a
notification followed by the
same, this provision was
brought in public domain.
However, despite the same,
surprisingly many tax payers
were receiving notices,
wherein the calculation of
interest was still being done on
Gross tax liability and not on
Net tax liability. Thus, this
amendment will certainly bring
an end to this tasking
challenge faced by the
taxpayers.
6E x p lanation 1 to Section 74
clause (ii) where the notice
under the same
proceedings is issued to
the main person liable to
pay tax and some other
persons, and such
proceedings against the
main person have been
concluded under section
73 or section 74, the
proceedings against all the
persons liable to pay
penalty under sections
122, 125, 129 and 130 are
deemed to be concluded.
In section 74 of the Central
Goods and Services Tax Act, in
Explanation 1, in clause (ii), for
the words and figures
“sections 122, 125, 129 and
130”, the words and figures
“sections 122 and 125” shall
be substituted
The penalty proceedings if any
under section 129 and 130, will now
not be given an automatic status of
being concluded just because the
proceedings of tax recovery have
been concluded u/s 73 and 74 of
the CGST Act 2017.
7S e c tion75(12)
Notwithstanding anything
contained in section 73 or
section 74, where any
amount of self-assessed
tax in accordance with a
return furnished under
section 39 remains unpaid,
either wholly or partly, or
any amount of interest
payable on such tax
remains unpaid, the same
shall be recovered under
the provisions of section
79.
In section 75 of the Central
Goods and Services Tax Act, in
sub-section (12),
the following Explanation shall
be inserted, namely
‘Explanation. For the purposes
of this sub-section, the
expression “self-assessed tax”
shall include the tax payable
in respect of details of
outward supplies furnished
under section 37, but not
included in the return
furnished under section 39.’
Any tax declared as payable by
virtue of the taxable supplies
declared under GSTR-1 returns and
where the said tax amount is not
being reported in the return GSTR-
3B for the same tax period, then the
difference between tax payable
between GSTR1 and GSTR3B return,
shall be considered as a self
assessed tax payable under this Act.
Currently, notices are being served
wherever there are discrepancies in
tax payable as per GSTR-1 vis-à-vis
tax payable as per GSTR-3B. Only if
tax as per GSTR-1>GSTR-3B.
81 ) W here during the pendency
of any proceedings under
section 62 or section 63 or
section 64 or section 67 or
section 73 or section 74, the
Commissioner is of the
opinion that for the purpose
of protecting the interest of
the Government revenue, it is
necessary so to do, he may, by
order in writing attach
provisionally any property,
including bank account,
belonging to the taxable
person in such manner as may
be prescribed. (2) Every such
provisional attachment shall
cease to have effect after the
expiry of a period of one year
from the date of the order
made under sub-section (1).
In section 83 of the Central Goods
and Services Tax Act, for subsection
(1), the following subsection
shall be substituted,
namely:–– “(1) Where, after the
initiation of any proceeding under
Chapter XII, Chapter XIV or
Chapter XV, the Commissioner is
of the opinion that for the
purpose of protecting the interest
of the Government revenue it is
necessary so to do, he may, by
order in writing, attach
provisionally, any property,
including bank account, belonging
to the taxable person or any
person specified in sub-section
(1A) of section 122, in such
manner as may be prescribed
The scope of the existing
provisions has been
expanded. Also the time limit
for which the assets and
bank accounts were allowed
to remain ceased has been
taken away. The provisions
are very much a move to
ensure no loss to
government in case of
defaulting tax payers.
9S e ction 107 (6) No appeal shall
be filed under sub-section (1),
unless the appellant has
paid— (a) in full, such part of
the amount of tax, interest,
fine, fee and penalty arising
from the impugned order, as is
admitted by him; and (b) a
sum equal to ten per cent. of
the remaining amount of tax in
dispute arising from the said
order, in relation to which the
appeal has been filed.
In section 107 of the Central
Goods and Services Tax Act, in
sub-section
(6), the following proviso shall be
inserted, namely
“Provided that no appeal shall be
filed against an order under subsection
(3) of section 129, unless a
sum equal to twenty-five per cent.
of the penalty has been paid by
the appellant
In case of any appeals against
the detention or seizing of
goods or conveyance, is to be
filed then the quantum of
pre-deposit shall be raised to
25% instead of 10% currently
applicable. However as this is
a specific insertion of proviso
only in reference to appeal
u/s 129(3), in case of other
appeals, we believe the pre
deposit % for penalty will be
only 10%.
10Section 129(1) (a) on payment of the
applicable tax and penalty equal to
one hundred per cent. of the tax
payable on such goods and, in case
of exempted goods, on payment of
an amount equal to two per cent. of
the value of goods or twenty-five
thousand rupees, whichever is less,
where the owner of the goods
comes forward for payment of such
tax and penalty; (b) on payment of
the applicable tax and penalty equal
to the fifty per cent. of the value of
the goods reduced by the tax
amount paid thereon and, in case of
exempted goods, on payment of an
amount equal to five per cent. of the
value of goods or twenty-five
thousand rupees, whichever is less,
where the owner of the goods does
not come forward for payment of
such tax and penalty;
“(a) on payment of penalty equal
to two hundred per cent. of the
tax payable on such goods and, in
case of exempted goods, on
payment of an amount equal to
two per cent. of the value of
goods or twenty-five thousand
rupees, whichever is less, where
the owner of the goods comes
forward for payment of such
penalty; (b) on payment of
penalty equal to fifty per cent. of
the value of the goods or two
hundred per cent. of the tax
payable on such goods, whichever
is higher, and in case of exempted
goods, on payment of an amount
equal to five per cent. of the value
of goods or twenty-five thousand
rupees, whichever is less, where
the owner of the goods does not
come forward for payment of
such penalty;
In case of detention
and seizure of goods or
conveyance thereof
the penalty now stands
increased. The purpose
is to further tighten the
grip and ensure
legitimate movement
of goods and
conveyances. These
would however be
seemingly punishable
in case of some small
clerical errors in Eway
bills which
unfortunately lead to
detention and seizure.
The only brighter part
is that instead of
earlier demand of
(tax+penalty) now
goods can be released
only on payment of
penalty
11Section 129 (2) The
provisions of sub-section
(6) of section 67 shall,
mutatis mutandis, apply for
detention and seizure of
goods and conveyances.
Section 129 (3) The proper
officer detaining or seizing
goods or conveyances shall
issue a notice specifying
the tax and penalty
payable and thereafter,
pass an order for payment
of tax and penalty under
clause (a) or clause (b) or
clause (c).
(ii) sub-section (2) shall be
omitted;
“(3) The proper officer
detaining or seizing goods or
conveyance shall issue a notice
within seven days of such
detention or seizure,
specifying the penalty payable,
and thereafter, pass an order
within a period of seven days
from the date of service of
such notice, for payment of
penalty under clause (a) or
clause (b) of sub-section (1).”;
The mutatis mutandis applicability
of provisions of Section 67(6) stands
withdrawn for the provisions of
section 129.
The time limits have been regulated
in order to ensure that the
detention and release of
goods/conveyance will be time
bound.
12Section 129 (4) No tax,
interest or penalty shall be
determined under subsection
(3) without giving
the person concerned an
opportunity of being
heard.
(iv) in sub-section (4), for the
words “No tax, interest or
penalty”, the words “No
penalty” shall be substituted;
Since now penalty needs to be paid
for releasing the detained
goods/conveyance, the words tax
and interest have been eliminated.
13Section 129(6) Where the
person transporting any
goods or the owner of the
goods fails to pay the
amount of tax and penalty
as provided in sub-section
(1) within seven days of
such detention or seizure,
further proceedings shall
be initiated in accordance
with the provisions of
section 130
(6) Where the person
transporting any goods or the
owner of such goods fails to
pay the amount of penalty
under sub-section (1) within
fifteen days from the date of
receipt of the copy of the
order passed under subsection
(3), the goods or
conveyance so detained or
seized shall be liable to be sold
or disposed of otherwise, in
such manner and within such
time as may be prescribed, to
recover the penalty payable
under sub-section (3)
Now, only penalty needs to be paid
for release of the detained
goods/conveyance and the time
limit also stands increased to 15
days.
14Proviso to Section 129
Provided that where the
detained or seized goods
are perishable or
hazardous in nature or are
likely to depreciate in value
with passage of time, the
said period of seven days
may be reduced by the
proper officer.
Provided that the conveyance
shall be released on payment
by the transporter of penalty
under sub-section (3) or one
lakh rupees, whichever is less
Provided further that where
the detained or seized goods
are perishable or hazardous in
nature or are likely to
depreciate in value with
passage of time, the said
period of fifteen days may be
reduced by the proper
officer.”.
This is a newly inserted proviso. In
case the penalty is payable then in
case of higher penalty, the
transporter can get conveyance
released by making the said
payment.
Same proviso continues only where
the original time limit was 7 days,
now with increased time limit of 15
days, the nature of the proviso
remains the same.
15Section 130. (1)
Notwithstanding anything
contained in this Act, if any
person
Section 130(2) Second Proviso
Provided further that the
aggregate of such fine and
penalty leviable shall not be less
than the amount of penalty
leviable under sub-section (1) of
section 129
(3) Where any fine in lieu of
confiscation of goods or
conveyance is imposed under
sub-section (2), the owner of
such goods or conveyance or
the person referred to in subsection
(1), shall, in addition, be
liable to any tax, penalty and
charges payable in respect of
such goods or conveyance
(a) in sub-section (1), for the
words “Notwithstanding
anything contained in this
Act, if ”, the word “Where”
shall be substituted.
(b) in sub-section (2), in the
second proviso, for the
words, brackets and figures
“amount of penalty leviable
under sub-section (1) of
section 129”, the words
“penalty equal to hundred
per cent. of the tax payable
on such goods” shall be
substituted;
Sub-section 3 stands omitted
Elimination of Non-obstante
clause
16(1) The Commissioner may,
if he considers that it is
necessary so to do, by
notification, direct that statistics
may be collected relating to any
matter dealt with by or in
connection with this Act.
(2) Upon such notification being
issued, the Commissioner, or
any person authorised by him in
this behalf, may call upon the
concerned persons to furnish
such information or returns, in
such form and manner as may
be prescribed, relating to any
matter in respect of which
statistics is to be collected .
“151. The Commissioner or
an officer authorised by him
may, by an order, direct any
person to furnish information
relating to any matter dealt
with in connection with this
Act, within such time, in such
form, and in such manner, as
may be specified therein.”.
This will increase the pace at
which the authorities will get
the necessary data. Also the
extension of power will give a
broader ground for gathering
necessary data.
17(1) No information of any
individual return or part thereof
with respect to any matter given
for the purposes of section 150
or section 151 shall, without the
previous consent in writing of
the concerned person or his
authorised representative, be
published in such manner so as
to enable such particulars to be
identified as referring to a
particular person and no such
information shall be used for
the purpose of any proceedings
under this Act.
(i) the words “of any
individual return or part
thereof” shall be omitted;
(ii) after the words “any
proceedings under this Act”,
the words “without giving an
opportunity of being heard to
the person concerned” shall
be inserted;
Gesture is good one but
practical implementation seems
difficult.
18Supply of Goods The
following shall be treated as
supply of goods, namely:—
Supply of goods by any
unincorporated association or
body of persons to a member
thereof for cash, deferred
payment or other valuable
consideration
In Schedule II of the
Central Goods and Services
Tax Act, paragraph 7 shall be
omitted and shall be deemed
to have been omitted with
effect from the 1st day of July,
2017
Discussed in point 1.
19(1) “zero rated supply”
means any of the following
supplies of goods or services or
both, namely:–– (a) export of
goods or services or both; or (b)
supply of goods or services or
both to a Special Economic Zone
developer or a Special Economic
Zone unit
(a) in sub-section (1), in
clause (b), after the words
“supply of goods or services
or both”, the words “for
authorised operations” shall
be inserted;
Going forward, not anything
and everything supplied to a
SEZ will constitute to be a Zero
rated supply. Only if the goods
or services which will be for the
purpose of ‘Authorized
operations’ as applicable to the
recipient in SEZ, will be eligible
to be supplied as a Zero rated
supply and thus consequent
benefits relating thereto
(refunds) will not be eligible if
the supply to SEZ unit is for
other than the recipients
‘Authorized operations’
20(3) A registered person
making zero rated supply
shall be eligible to claim
refund under either of the
following options, namely
(a) he may supply goods or
services or both under
bond or Letter of
Undertaking, subject to
such conditions, safeguards
and procedure as may be
prescribed, without
payment of integrated tax
and claim refund of
unutilised input tax credit
“(3) A registered person making zero rated
supply shall be eligible to claim refund of
unutilised input tax credit on supply of goods
or services or both, without payment of
integrated tax, under bond or Letter of
Undertaking, in accordance with the
provisions of section 54 of the Central Goods
and Services Tax Act or the rules made
thereunder, subject to such conditions,
safeguards and procedure as may be
prescribed:
Provided that the registered person making
zero rated supply of goods shall, in case of
non-realisation of sale proceeds, be liable to
deposit the refund so received under this
sub-section along with the applicable interest
under section 50 of the Central Goods and
Services Tax Act within thirty days after the
expiry of the time limit prescribed under the
Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 for
receipt of foreign exchange remittances, in
such manner as may be prescribed.
Non realization of export
proceeds in foreign currency
leads to non fulfilment of the
very purpose for which zero
rated supplies are permitted.
Thus in order to ensure that
no benefits are unduly
passed on, the refunds
granted for export of goods
will be liable to be paid as a
liability along with applicable
interest, if the export
proceeds are not received
within time allowed under
FEMA.
In case of services this would
not be applicable, as the
same is checked in the very
refund application through
EBRC/FIRC
21(b) he may supply goods
or services or both,
subject to such
conditions, safeguards
and procedure as may be
prescribed, on payment
of integrated tax and
claim refund of such tax
paid on goods or services
or both supplied, in
accordance with the
provisions of section 54 of
the Central Goods and
Services Tax Act or the
rules made thereunder.
(4) The Government may, on the
recommendation of the Council, and
subject to such conditions, safeguards and
procedures, by notification, specify–– (i) a
class of persons who may make zero rated
supply on payment of integrated tax and
claim refund of the tax so paid; (ii) a class
of goods or services which may be
exported on payment of integrated tax
and the supplier of such goods or services
may claim the refund of tax so paid.”
This doesn’t seem to be a
very welcome move. Now if
the choice of making export
with/without payment of tax
gets a capping of a category
of exporter or category of
goods or services specifically,
then its harsh to say that
there are two methods of
making Zero rated supplies
viz- with/without payment of
IGST

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are on the basis of our understanding of the provisions of GST Law, Rules and Regulations. The adjudicating authorities, courts may or may not agree with the views expressed above.

Default image
AUMKAR SURENDRA
CA Aumkar Surendra Gadgil He has completed his Chartered Accountancy in May 2012 and completed his Masters degree in commerce in May 2011. Has successfully completed the Certificate course in Indirect taxes conducted by “ICAI” in Jan 2014. He was selected as a panel faculty in the National level faculty development program conducted by ICAI Indirect tax committee in Jan 2015. He is a Chartered Accountant in Practice based out in Mumbai and Pune.
Articles: 6